Openfund

CORDIS · CEASEVAL

Evaluation of the Common European Asylum System under Pressure and Recommendations for Further Development

Code
CEASEVAL
Programme
H2020
Call
ENG-GLOBALLY-10-2017
Status
CLOSED
Period
2017-11-01 – 2019-10-31
Total cost (whole consortium)2 003 919 €
EU contribution (whole consortium)2 003 919 €
EU contribution to Bulgarian participants35 925 €

Official data · CORDIS · synced 2026-10-18 03:29 · official record

Participants

OrganisationsRoleCountryGrant
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET CHEMNITZcoordinatorDE246 712 €
THE UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEXparticipantUK244 162 €
UNIVERSITE DU LUXEMBOURGparticipantLU236 989 €
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MIGRATION POLICY DEVELOPMENTparticipantAT214 512 €
FORUM INTERNAZIONALE ED EUROPEO DI RICERCHE SULL'IMMIGRAZIONEparticipantIT193 460 €
EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES AISBLparticipantBE133 500 €
CENTRE D'INFORMACIO I DOCUMENTACIO INTERNACIONALS A BARCELONAparticipantES127 575 €
STICHTING VUparticipantNL119 599 €
UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAMparticipantNL103 214 €
Elliniko Idryma Evropaikis kai Exoterikis Politikis (HELLENIC FOUNDATION FOR EUROPEAN AND FOREIGN POLICY)participantEL99 409 €
HELSINGIN YLIOPISTOparticipantFI90 250 €
KOC UNIVERSITYparticipantTR89 218 €
TARKI TARSADALOMKUTATASI INTEZET ZRTparticipantHU69 394 €
NOV BALGARSKI UNIVERSITETparticipantBG35 925 €

Description

Since 2015, migration towards and within Europe has created a ‘stress’ in the EU asylum and migration systems, challenging the adequacy of the legal design of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). This impacted the implementation of both the CEAS and national asylum systems in practice and called its further harmonisation into question. The notion of harmonisation is not a fixed term, but rather incorporates varied meanings and practices. While in legal terms, harmonisation has been explained as an approximation process towards minimum standards, harmonisation in political terms rather focuses on policy convergence, of which the harmonisation of legal regimes is only one among many mechanisms of convergence. Taking these varied meanings into account, CEASEVAL will carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the CEAS in terms of its framework and practice. It will make an analysis of harmonisation which goes beyond the formal institutional setting and takes into account the complex relations among the actors engaged from the local and the national levels, to the European level, in order to explain the success and the failure of coordinated action between these varied actors. CEASEVAL will innovatively 1) combine multiple disciplines in order to explore different perspectives of the CEAS, 2) develop a new theoretical framework of multilevel governance of the CEAS, which will be empirically tested across several EU Member States and third countries, 3) provide a critical evaluation of the CEAS by identifying and analysing discrepancies in the transposition and incorporation of European standards in the area of asylum in domestic legislation, as well as differences in their implementation, and 4) elaborate new policies by constructing different alternatives of implementing a common European asylum system. On this basis, CEASEVAL will determine which kind of harmonisation (legislative, implementation, etc.) and solidarity is possible and necessary.

Official data · CORDIS · synced 2026-10-18 03:29 · official record · Licence: © European Union, CC BY 4.0 (Commission reuse policy).