Openfund

CORDIS · RESPOND

RESPOND- Rescuing Democracy from Political Corruption in Digital Societies

Code
RESPOND
Programme
HORIZON
Call
HORIZON-CL2-2023-DEMOCRACY-01-03
Status
SIGNED
Period
2024-05-01 – 2029-04-30
Total cost (whole consortium)5 531 961 €
EU contribution (whole consortium)5 531 961 €
EU contribution to Bulgarian participants294 200 €

Official data · CORDIS · synced 2026-10-17 10:16 · official record

Participants

OrganisationsRoleCountryGrant
ALMA MATER STUDIORUM - UNIVERSITA DI BOLOGNAcoordinatorIT606 431 €
CEU GMBHparticipantAT708 501 €
UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAMparticipantNL605 354 €
UNIVERSITA CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUOREparticipantIT589 000 €
FONDATION NATIONALE DES SCIENCES POLITIQUESparticipantFR483 001 €
INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS SOCIAISparticipantPT412 526 €
AKKI ATLATHATO KORMANYZAS KUTATOINTEZET KFTparticipantHU404 801 €
GOETEBORGS UNIVERSITETparticipantSE363 228 €
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNICATION AISBLparticipantBE337 616 €
INSTITUT ZA GLOBALNI ANALIZIparticipantBG294 200 €
UNIVERSITAET DUISBURG-ESSENparticipantDE281 125 €
LIBERA - ASSOCIAZIONI, NOMI E NUMERI CONTRO LE MAFIEparticipantIT224 052 €
ANTI CORRUPTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTREparticipantUA222 125 €
TELE RADIO CITY SOCIETA COOPERATIVA SOCIALEthird partyIT0 €
NET7 SRLthird partyIT0 €
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRSthird partyFR0 €
KING'S COLLEGE LONDONassociated partnerUK

Description

Corruption and undue influences are not only linked to democratic discontent but compromise the quality of democracy. But how exactly does political corruption operate today? How deep can its negative impact on democracy go? And how can anti-corruption efforts recover people’s support for democracy as a regime and promote their engagement with integrity and their refusal of undemocratic proposals and actions? To address these crucial challenges for democracy, RESPOND proposes a novel interdisciplinary assessment of political corruption, seen here as conducts and acts, often proliferating in grey zones regarding legality, that results in decision-making bias and exclusion in the policy cycle. It does so by: 1) analyzing four contemporary and relevant forms of political influence (political finance, lobbying, revolving doors/personal ties and media capture) to understand when they become troubling forms of influences connected to specific political corruption patterns; hence, undermining fair competition and broad participation in political decision-making processes; 2) evaluating how political corruption is understood by political elites and citizens and is socially constructed through media and education, as well as its impacts on both democracy’s legitimacy and credibility and on responses to counter them; 3) exploring how established and emerging digital technologies entangle with political corruption and how they improve anti-corruption and pro-integrity strategies at both national and cross-border levels; 4) engaging in co-creation with relevant stakeholders to design, test, and revise practices and tools, including new risk indicators developed by RESPOND, to increase civic monitoring and integrity in current democracies. Through a mixed-method research design, RESPOND investigates 27 EU countries and 11 neighbouring countries to signal ways to make governments, public officials, and political parties perform better ethically and recover democracy’s popularity.

Official data · CORDIS · synced 2026-10-17 10:16 · official record · Licence: © European Union, CC BY 4.0 (Commission reuse policy).