Openfund

CORDIS · INSPIRE

Intersectional Spaces of Participation: Inclusive, Resilient, Embedded

Код
INSPIRE
Програма
HORIZON
Процедура
HORIZON-CL2-2023-DEMOCRACY-01-07
Статус
SIGNED
Период
01.04.2024 – 31.03.2027
Обща стойност (целият консорциум)2 457 588 €
Принос на ЕС (целият консорциум)2 457 588 €
Принос на ЕС за българските участници202 138 €

Официални данни · CORDIS · синхронизирано 17.10.2026 10:16 · официален запис

Участници

ОрганизацииРоляДържаваБезвъзмездна помощ
JOHANN WOLFGANG GOETHE-UNIVERSITAET FRANKFURT AM MAINкоординаторDE604 610 €
FUNDACION PLATONIQучастникES278 161 €
APPLIED RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS FUNDучастникBG202 138 €
UNIVERZITA KARLOVAучастникCZ174 974 €
UNIWERSYTET WARSZAWSKIучастникPL164 293 €
IPSOS NVучастникBE162 996 €
APHELION LTDучастникIE161 541 €
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK - NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORKучастникIE151 486 €
FILOSOFICKY USTAV AV CR V V IучастникCZ149 000 €
INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS SOCIAISучастникPT128 016 €
ELTE TARSADALOMTUDOMANYI KUTATOKOZPONTучастникHU93 340 €
PROSSIMA DEMOCRAZIA - LABORATORI DELIBERATIVI APSучастникIT85 625 €
FUNDACION INSTITUT DE EDUCACION CONTINUAучастникES72 980 €
UNIVERSITAT AUTONOMA DE BARCELONAучастникES28 427 €
UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTERасоцииран партньорUK
THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAMасоцииран партньорUK
THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGHасоцииран партньорUK
KING'S COLLEGE LONDONасоцииран партньорUK

Описание

Participatory and deliberative democracy (PDD) processes have on the one hand been celebrated for their potential in addressing political distrust and polarisation by deepening public engagement. On the other hand, they are often accused of being cosmetic solutions to deep-seated problems that continue to exclude already disempowered groups (along socioeconomic, gender, racial, physical and mental ability lines). INSPIRE aims to tackle these accusations and failures by fostering intersectional equality, through participatory spaces that are: inclusive and start from the needs and assets of marginalised groups; resilient to changes in government and developing upon existing grassroots work to support community resilience; and embedded within the wider public sphere and in productive relationships with policymaking institutions (Bussu et al 2022a; Escobar 2022).We employ three key ideas: the political economy of participation, co-design, and assemblage theory. We place emphasis on socioeconomic factors that affect people’s capabilities to participate, or the political economy of participation. We use a range of arts-based, digital and creative methods to co-design with participants inclusive participatory spaces that move beyond just talk-centric deliberation, which can exacerbate existing inequalities. To analyse and foster intersectional equality within PDD we need to overcome the linearity and oversimplification that sometimes characterise methodological approaches in the field, which tend to overlook the dynamism, complexity, and messiness of participation. The concept of assemblage helps us look at how different participatory practices coexist, interact and change across local, national and transnational levels. Using these theoretical and analytical tools we can trace more clearly processes and power dynamics that exacerbate inequalities, and we can strengthen democratic and inclusive participation through its many forms and practices.

Официални данни · CORDIS · синхронизирано 17.10.2026 10:16 · официален запис · Лиценз: © European Union, CC BY 4.0 (Commission reuse policy).